Absence
of cognition in one's mind forces one to think in terms of past,
without being able to relate to the present, the present being what
one cognizes (the image of the present object one becomes aware of) .
When this becomes a habit, where one cannot cognize the present
image, hence only thinks in terms of Past, it would lead to
Hallucinations. How?
Mind always tries to compare its past knowledge, words, visual images, sound images, etc., stored in the memory, that with the cognitive words and images which mind temporarily captures of the present, to be compared with and to think. When mind fails to do this, due to cognitive Gaps, where one cannot be cognitive to the present just as Kriahnamurti, Mind will play a trick. Mind will produce the past Images of visuals, sounds, etc., as present images of Cognitions, making one to feel that he is 'seeing' things, hearing things, etc., which are taking palace at present. Then the mind will interact with such false cognitions, with that of the past to recognize them and to think of them as present cognition, which is false. This is hallucination, where the Gaps in cognition itself is 'not present objects', but is filled by the past memory objects itself and recognized by the past itself, as thinking.
This happened to Krishnamurti.
Quote:
In 1903, the family settled in Cudappah, where Krishnamurti had contracted malaria during a previous stay. He would suffer recurrent bouts of the disease over many years. A sensitive and sickly child, "vague and dreamy," he was often taken to be intellectually disabled, and was beaten regularly at school by his teachers and at home by his father. In memoirs written when he was eighteen years (1923) old, Krishnamurti described psychic experiences, such as seeing his sister, who had died in 1904, and his late mother.
Source: Wikipedia
End of Quote.
What are the outcomes of Hallucinations?
It is same as Division or Fragmentation in thinking. When one communicate such experiences, others would understand that such a thing did not happen. So he would be denied by others, ridiculed, laughed at, etc., which would cause, insecurity, doubt, fear, sufferings, etc.
This will lead to one to seclude oneself from the society, work, with friends and family. Such one needs care, love and understanding by others to overcome this situation of fear and insecurity, but not to cure oneself from the problems within.
Kriahnamurti was lucky to have this care, love and understanding, thanks to Theosophical Society, which took care of him. Otherwise what would have happened to Krishnamurti?
Quote:
Following his discovery by Leadbeater, Krishnamurti was nurtured by the Theosophical Society in Adyar. Leadbeater and a small number of trusted associates undertook the task of educating, protecting, and generally preparing Krishnamurti as the "vehicle" of the expected World Teacher. Krishnamurti (often later called Krishnaji) and his younger brother Nityananda (Nitya) were privately tutored at the Theosophical compound in Madras, and later exposed to a comparatively opulent life among a segment of European high society, as they continued their education abroad. Despite his history of problems with schoolwork and concerns about his capacities and physical condition, the 14-year-old Krishnamurti was able to speak and write competently in English within six months. Lutyens says that later in life Krishnamurti came to view his "discovery" as a life-saving event. Often, he was "asked in later life what he thought would have happened to him if he had not been 'discovered' by Leadbeater. He would unhesitatingly reply, 'I would have died'.
Source: Wikipedia
End of Quote.
Since, these love, care and understanding took care of Krishnamurti, he was able to concentrate on the problem he had and able to understand the Division within him, without suspecting anyone around him of as spying on him or to fear them, though fear, insecurity arise in him.
So, K was able to look at these inner problems, with much attentiveness and was able to explain them with much accuracy, choosing unambiguous words and also not mixing up with similar words. But only he was not able to detect the missing attributes of the Mind, which gave rise to the Gaps in the mind, which is understandable, as how one can guess of a missing item, since there is no way to detect them.
But the Krishnamurti's attempt to relate the inner Division with that of superficial division which exists in the outside world, leads to an erroneous lot of explanations, which covers 95% of his discourses. Hence, it is evident, that the reader or listener of Krishnamurti, usually who don't have this problem of inner Division or Fragmentation in his thinking, mislead by these grand explanations of the superficial, without being able to understand the factual Division within Krishnamurti.
It is evident, that misled by this superficial explanations of Krishnamurti of his inner Division, and when K says this problem of Division can be ended, when one understand the division, thus one comes to the realization of the Unknown, The Thoughtless, which is Pathless. Though, it has happened as it is, to Krishnamurti, since he had the Division or Fragmentation of the mind, will it would happen to a person who is not fragmented in his thinking? But many who understand Krishnamurti, superficially, seems to expect this to happen to them, and they wait 'without expectation', or 'without desire' that to happen, as K said that one cannot desire or expect it, then it would be perpetuating the division further. But for these people, who don't have the division, it would not be a perpetuation to desire or to expect, but even if they "desire and expect" or "not desire and not expect", it would not happen to them, since they don't have the Division within.
Mind always tries to compare its past knowledge, words, visual images, sound images, etc., stored in the memory, that with the cognitive words and images which mind temporarily captures of the present, to be compared with and to think. When mind fails to do this, due to cognitive Gaps, where one cannot be cognitive to the present just as Kriahnamurti, Mind will play a trick. Mind will produce the past Images of visuals, sounds, etc., as present images of Cognitions, making one to feel that he is 'seeing' things, hearing things, etc., which are taking palace at present. Then the mind will interact with such false cognitions, with that of the past to recognize them and to think of them as present cognition, which is false. This is hallucination, where the Gaps in cognition itself is 'not present objects', but is filled by the past memory objects itself and recognized by the past itself, as thinking.
This happened to Krishnamurti.
Quote:
In 1903, the family settled in Cudappah, where Krishnamurti had contracted malaria during a previous stay. He would suffer recurrent bouts of the disease over many years. A sensitive and sickly child, "vague and dreamy," he was often taken to be intellectually disabled, and was beaten regularly at school by his teachers and at home by his father. In memoirs written when he was eighteen years (1923) old, Krishnamurti described psychic experiences, such as seeing his sister, who had died in 1904, and his late mother.
Source: Wikipedia
End of Quote.
What are the outcomes of Hallucinations?
It is same as Division or Fragmentation in thinking. When one communicate such experiences, others would understand that such a thing did not happen. So he would be denied by others, ridiculed, laughed at, etc., which would cause, insecurity, doubt, fear, sufferings, etc.
This will lead to one to seclude oneself from the society, work, with friends and family. Such one needs care, love and understanding by others to overcome this situation of fear and insecurity, but not to cure oneself from the problems within.
Kriahnamurti was lucky to have this care, love and understanding, thanks to Theosophical Society, which took care of him. Otherwise what would have happened to Krishnamurti?
Quote:
Following his discovery by Leadbeater, Krishnamurti was nurtured by the Theosophical Society in Adyar. Leadbeater and a small number of trusted associates undertook the task of educating, protecting, and generally preparing Krishnamurti as the "vehicle" of the expected World Teacher. Krishnamurti (often later called Krishnaji) and his younger brother Nityananda (Nitya) were privately tutored at the Theosophical compound in Madras, and later exposed to a comparatively opulent life among a segment of European high society, as they continued their education abroad. Despite his history of problems with schoolwork and concerns about his capacities and physical condition, the 14-year-old Krishnamurti was able to speak and write competently in English within six months. Lutyens says that later in life Krishnamurti came to view his "discovery" as a life-saving event. Often, he was "asked in later life what he thought would have happened to him if he had not been 'discovered' by Leadbeater. He would unhesitatingly reply, 'I would have died'.
Source: Wikipedia
End of Quote.
Since, these love, care and understanding took care of Krishnamurti, he was able to concentrate on the problem he had and able to understand the Division within him, without suspecting anyone around him of as spying on him or to fear them, though fear, insecurity arise in him.
So, K was able to look at these inner problems, with much attentiveness and was able to explain them with much accuracy, choosing unambiguous words and also not mixing up with similar words. But only he was not able to detect the missing attributes of the Mind, which gave rise to the Gaps in the mind, which is understandable, as how one can guess of a missing item, since there is no way to detect them.
But the Krishnamurti's attempt to relate the inner Division with that of superficial division which exists in the outside world, leads to an erroneous lot of explanations, which covers 95% of his discourses. Hence, it is evident, that the reader or listener of Krishnamurti, usually who don't have this problem of inner Division or Fragmentation in his thinking, mislead by these grand explanations of the superficial, without being able to understand the factual Division within Krishnamurti.
It is evident, that misled by this superficial explanations of Krishnamurti of his inner Division, and when K says this problem of Division can be ended, when one understand the division, thus one comes to the realization of the Unknown, The Thoughtless, which is Pathless. Though, it has happened as it is, to Krishnamurti, since he had the Division or Fragmentation of the mind, will it would happen to a person who is not fragmented in his thinking? But many who understand Krishnamurti, superficially, seems to expect this to happen to them, and they wait 'without expectation', or 'without desire' that to happen, as K said that one cannot desire or expect it, then it would be perpetuating the division further. But for these people, who don't have the division, it would not be a perpetuation to desire or to expect, but even if they "desire and expect" or "not desire and not expect", it would not happen to them, since they don't have the Division within.
No comments:
Post a Comment